<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparison Canon EOS 500D vs Nikon D5000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.1people1camera.com/2009/04/19/comparison-canon-eos-500d-vs-nikon-d5000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.1people1camera.com/2009/04/19/comparison-canon-eos-500d-vs-nikon-d5000/</link>
	<description>Include the topic related to DSLR Lens, and also Digital SLR Camera.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:53:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gavin</title>
		<link>http://www.1people1camera.com/2009/04/19/comparison-canon-eos-500d-vs-nikon-d5000/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 07:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1people1camera.com/2009/04/19/comparison-canon-eos-500d-vs-nikon-d5000/#comment-227</guid>
		<description>To me Nikon&#039;s (especially D5000) features are no issue to me, i think Nikon is trying to bridge between a standard camera with a DSLR, that&#039;s why they come up with such features found in a standard camera, also we must agree-the handling is better with double main dial.  I need no those, for this reason i prefer Canon for better performance and actually i prefer Canon&#039;s color result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me Nikon&#8217;s (especially D5000) features are no issue to me, i think Nikon is trying to bridge between a standard camera with a DSLR, that&#8217;s why they come up with such features found in a standard camera, also we must agree-the handling is better with double main dial.  I need no those, for this reason i prefer Canon for better performance and actually i prefer Canon&#8217;s color result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siddhartha Basu, India</title>
		<link>http://www.1people1camera.com/2009/04/19/comparison-canon-eos-500d-vs-nikon-d5000/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Siddhartha Basu, India</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 18:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1people1camera.com/2009/04/19/comparison-canon-eos-500d-vs-nikon-d5000/#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Most experienced photographers realize that unless you have some specialized needs (big money telephotos, multiple flash setups, etc.), all the big brands make camera systems produce almost same results. this difference really holds for advanced and professional users who are looking for cutting edge (read: expensive) performance - the kind
that comes from $5000 bodies and lenses. 

Camera body constitutes half of the story. The other one falls on the lenses. So, a hobbyist should look after the other deciding factor - lenses, made by the manufacturer of the camera. 

On this count, Nikon 18-200 VR II is an all purpose lenses for almost 90% users (price around $500) - alternative one may go for Nikon 55-200 mm lens at a fantastic price (price around $200). coupled with bundled 18-55 mm Nikon VR, this is an excellent package. Canon 28-200 mm lacks the build quality and pricey. 

So, I ll go for Nikon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most experienced photographers realize that unless you have some specialized needs (big money telephotos, multiple flash setups, etc.), all the big brands make camera systems produce almost same results. this difference really holds for advanced and professional users who are looking for cutting edge (read: expensive) performance &#8211; the kind<br />
that comes from $5000 bodies and lenses. </p>
<p>Camera body constitutes half of the story. The other one falls on the lenses. So, a hobbyist should look after the other deciding factor &#8211; lenses, made by the manufacturer of the camera. </p>
<p>On this count, Nikon 18-200 VR II is an all purpose lenses for almost 90% users (price around $500) &#8211; alternative one may go for Nikon 55-200 mm lens at a fantastic price (price around $200). coupled with bundled 18-55 mm Nikon VR, this is an excellent package. Canon 28-200 mm lacks the build quality and pricey. </p>
<p>So, I ll go for Nikon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JONLANG</title>
		<link>http://www.1people1camera.com/2009/04/19/comparison-canon-eos-500d-vs-nikon-d5000/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>JONLANG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 07:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1people1camera.com/2009/04/19/comparison-canon-eos-500d-vs-nikon-d5000/#comment-223</guid>
		<description>I finally made up my mind. I will definitely buy a Canon D500.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally made up my mind. I will definitely buy a Canon D500.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3G Iphone Case</title>
		<link>http://www.1people1camera.com/2009/04/19/comparison-canon-eos-500d-vs-nikon-d5000/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>3G Iphone Case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 16:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1people1camera.com/2009/04/19/comparison-canon-eos-500d-vs-nikon-d5000/#comment-217</guid>
		<description>Hello, I found your blog in a new directory of blogs. I dont know how your weblog came up. Your weblog looks good. Have a nice day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, I found your blog in a new directory of blogs. I dont know how your weblog came up. Your weblog looks good. Have a nice day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuan wen</title>
		<link>http://www.1people1camera.com/2009/04/19/comparison-canon-eos-500d-vs-nikon-d5000/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>chuan wen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1people1camera.com/2009/04/19/comparison-canon-eos-500d-vs-nikon-d5000/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>EOS450d vs Nikon D5000, for me i would suggest u buy D5000 as it is newer technology, but of cos, now you may go for EOS500d or even the latest EOS550d...

EOS450d vs Nikon D5000, D5000 has lesser noise at high ISO (as i view the comment online, cos i never use nikon before), and D5000 got video capability...

but for me, i will buy EOS450d, because i am a canono supporter... :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EOS450d vs Nikon D5000, for me i would suggest u buy D5000 as it is newer technology, but of cos, now you may go for EOS500d or even the latest EOS550d&#8230;</p>
<p>EOS450d vs Nikon D5000, D5000 has lesser noise at high ISO (as i view the comment online, cos i never use nikon before), and D5000 got video capability&#8230;</p>
<p>but for me, i will buy EOS450d, because i am a canono supporter&#8230; <img src='http://www.1people1camera.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in <b>Unknown</b> on line <b>0</b><br />
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in <b>Unknown</b> on line <b>0</b><br />
